Re: Octave Control package bug ?

Parameshwara Bhat <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.octave.general
Message-ID <6072981.TEgDTksDoA@gothama>
On Sunday, 6 September, 2020 12:14:12 PM IST you wrote:




On Sunday, 6 September 2020, Parameshwara Bhat <[email protected][1]> wrote:


On Thursday, 3 September, 2020 9:16:41 AM IST Doug Stewart wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 10:01 PM Parameshwara Bhat <[email protected]_> wrote:
> 
> > On Tuesday, 1 September, 2020 12:31:25 AM IST Torsten Lilge wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 13:42 +0530, Parameshwara Bhat wrote:
> > > > Hello All,
> > > >
> > > > I am not able to generate pzmap OR bode OR nyquist. I receive error,
> > > >
> > > > "error: __zero__: function called with too many inputs
> > > > error: called from
> > > >     __zero__
> > > >     zero at line 140 column 23
> > > >     __frequency_vector__>__frequency_range__ at line 111 column 7
> > > >     __frequency_vector__ at line 52 column 26
> > > >     __frequency_response__ at line 98 column 7
> > > >     bode at line 66 column 20"
> > > >
> > > > This error I receive even if I give the exact demo commands for the
> > > > functions from the Documentation,like
> > > >
> > > > "s=tf('s');
> > > >  g=1/(s+1);
> > > >  pzmap(g); "
> > > >
> > > > I am running control package,"control *|        3.2.0 |
> > > > /usr/share/octave/packages/control-3.2.0" (output line from ver)
> > > >
> > > > I think it is a bug. But the package is one year old and should be
> > > > tested and stable. Am I missing something ?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks all in advance.
> > > >
> > > > P Bhat
> > >
> > > Your example with pzmap, bode, or nyquist works for me. What are the
> > > results of
> > >
> > >     pkg test control
> > >
> > > on your system?
> > >
> > > Torsten
> > >
> > I am attaching the log file fntest.log.
> >
> > There are failures. This package was installed from Manjaro repository
> > (AUR built).
> >
> > What options to correct ?
> >
> > Parameshwara.
> >
> 
> To help us debug this try
> which   __zero__
> and show us the results.
>
'which  _zero_'  outputs nothing, as below.
     *  

     *  ">> pkg load control
     *  >> which _zero_
     *  >> pkg unload control
     *  >> which _zero_
     *  >>"

Parameshwara. 




Try again but this time with TWO underscores each side of the zero:


 __zero__


Cheers... Ian


I  tried with "__zero__" (with two underscores either side)
No  output. Silent return to command line.

Parameshwara.

--------
[1] mailto:[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.