Re: Octave 6.1 issue

"Renato S. Yamane" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.octave.general
Message-ID <CANJjkzt1Pz4w1dR0kjf-dfHgfCcXSW22xOiJJGpZna5wUWWduA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,

There is a bug on Octave 6.1 reducing the performance a lot:
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?59711

Kind regards,
Renato



Em ter, 29 de dez de 2020 16:10, Rory Conolly <[email protected]>
escreveu:

> Hi, I've been working on a large optimization project (several hundred
> lines of code in multiple files spread over a main  directory  (folder) and
> several sub-directories). Have been making good progress with the work in
> Octave 5.2. Typical optimization runs take 6 to 12 hr on a Windows 10
> computer with an AMD Ryzen 9 3900X processor and plenty of RAM, with each
> iteration of the optimization taking about 25 - 30 seconds. A typical
> optimization run can involve 300 to over 1000 iterations of the main
> program.
>
> I recently installed Octave 6.1 on the same computer. The optimization
> runs identically, initially. But with time, the duration of each iteration
> starts to increase. After a couple of hundred iterations, each iteration is
> taking over a minute. This does not happen in Octave 5.2 - the iteration
> time stays the same until the optimization run completes.
>
> I'm using fminsearch, but I have adapted fminsearcbnd from the MATLAB user
> library. This allows me to specify bounds for the parameters being varied,
> which is important for my problem. So I call fminsearchbnd, which in turn
> calls fminsearch.
>
> The code is too large to post here but I thought I should bring this to
> the attention of the developers. Happy to help if there is something I can
> do.
>
> - Rory Conolly
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.