Re: help needed to verify expected behavior for scripts and nested functions
"Markus Mützel" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.octave.maintainers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <trinity-57f4c96b-5b6e-4819-bf10-00fc9d7ef435-1586606229316@3c-app-gmx-bap41> |
Am 08. April 2020 um 17:25 Uhr schrieb "John W. Eaton": > On 4/8/20 11:18 AM, "Markus Mützel" wrote: > > > Maybe this resource can help understanding their precedence order handling: > > https://de.mathworks.com/help/matlab/matlab_prog/function-precedence-order.html > > > > In particular "3. Nested functions within the current function". Looks like the script is *not* "within the current function". > > But what that really means is not entirely clear to me either from reading just the documentation. > > Yes, I know about that list. It's just confusing that a script appears > to be sort of like an include file but not. Is it possible that there are file(s) missing from the changeset adding related(?) BISTs? I can't find "script_nest_2": http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/7567413e7246 Markus