Re: help needed to verify expected behavior for scripts and nested functions

"Markus Mützel" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.octave.maintainers
Message-ID <trinity-57f4c96b-5b6e-4819-bf10-00fc9d7ef435-1586606229316@3c-app-gmx-bap41>
Am 08. April 2020 um 17:25 Uhr schrieb "John W. Eaton":
> On 4/8/20 11:18 AM, "Markus Mützel" wrote:
> 
> > Maybe this resource can help understanding their precedence order handling:
> > https://de.mathworks.com/help/matlab/matlab_prog/function-precedence-order.html
> > 
> > In particular "3. Nested functions within the current function". Looks like the script is *not* "within the current function".
> > But what that really means is not entirely clear to me either from reading just the documentation.
> 
> Yes, I know about that list.  It's just confusing that a script appears 
> to be sort of like an include file but not.

Is it possible that there are file(s) missing from the changeset adding related(?) BISTs?
I can't find "script_nest_2":
http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/7567413e7246

Markus
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.