Re: should Octave be more strict about checking number of arguments?
"John W. Eaton" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.octave.maintainers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/13/20 3:10 AM, Markus Mützel wrote: > I agree that the default branch is the one for this kind of changes. > It's possible they cause existing code to fail. We should probably let people know about this change with a note in the NEWS file. I added a note in the NEWS file. jwe