bug#22967: parted 3.2 fails to read MBR partition table where parted 2.3 was ok
Ulf Zibis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.parted.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I like to add that GRUB4DOS ist widely used on bootable pendrives e.g. with MultiSystem. So would be helpful, if it would be treated by parted. -Ulf Am 10.03.2016 um 00:23 schrieb a: > I can bring some more details: > > the problem definitely looks to be that parted 3.2 doesn't like the > GRUB4DOS MBR (see dump contents I supplied at end of in my first post), > while parted 2.3 is ok. > > > Indeed, when I reset the MBR with bootrec /FixMbr from a Win7 boot CD, > everything is ok in parted 3.2. > > > And as soon as I reinstall GRUB4DOS, no matter which version (0.4.5c or > 0.4.6a), parted can't read the partition table anymore. > > > Still, the partition table itself (0x1BE to 0x1FE) is totally identical > in all cases. > > > So something in the rest of the MBR contents, between 0 and 0x1BD, is > not digested by parted 3.2 ... are you able to tell what ? > GRUB4DOS being quite spread and used (Grub2 is too complex to configure > and requires to have a Linux install, which I do not have), parted > should compose with it like other Boot Managers .. shouldn't it ? > > Thank you for any hint/help or let me know if you need anything more, > Erwin9 >
smime.p7s
(application/pkcs7-signature, 2.4 KB) - not displayed