Re: fd_set_vector_max: misunderstanding or bug?
Lars Frantzen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.prolog.bugs |
|---|---|
| Organization | Radboud University Nijmegen |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Dirk, just a general comment here, I had similar problems with fd_set_vector_max on a 64bit Ubuntu 6.1.0 and gprolog 1.3.0. For instance test(A,B,C) :- A #=# 24, B #=<# 44, C #=# A*B, fd_labeling([A,B,C]). did not report all the solutons it should. I then tried the unstable version and there it works fine. Cheers, Lars On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:51:06 +0200 "Dirk Koschützki" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > I have sent the following mail yesterday but it did non appear in the > archive, therefore I resend it. > > Let me add that the barrier for working/non-working is 1728/1727. With > the larger value the computation leads to the correct result. > Interestingly, if I increase the value from 500 in steps to 1728 then > the number of solutions found increses until the correct value is > reached, too. > > Cheers, > Dirk > > --- Yesterdays mail --- > > i have a problem with the function fd_set_vector_max. My CSP needs > four variables (A-D) with are constrained to take values from 0 to > 563. If I set the fd_set_vector_max value to 564, then the system > finds only about 3000 solutions. If I increase fd_set_vector_max > dramatically, e.g. to 5640, then all solutions (>160000) are found. > > I checked with a different method that the >160000 solutions are correct. > > Please run the attached file and change the lines marked > "Fails"/"Works" to see the effect. > > My question is: Is this a misunderstanding of fd_set_vector_max, my > values are 0--N, therefore using N+1 should be ok, or is it a bug in > the implementation? > > Please contact me for further questions. > > Cheers, > Dirk > > > > This is my configuration: > > Running on Ubuntu 6.10 with the provided gprolog packages. > > Linux nw-08 2.6.17-11-generic #2 SMP Tue Mar 13 23:32:38 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux > > Prolog top-Level (GNU Prolog) 1.2.18 > By Daniel Diaz > Copyright (C) 1999-2004 Daniel Diaz > GNU Prolog comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. > You may redistribute copies of GNU Prolog > under the terms of the GNU General Public License. > For more information about these matters, see the files named COPYING. > > configure options are not available. > > $gprolog > [example]. > -- Lars Frantzen http://www.cs.ru.nl/~lf/