Re: nth in latest unstable version

Oups...

fixed (I hope :-)) in last snapshot:
http://gprolog.univ-paris1.fr/unstable/gprolog-20091204.tgz

Daniel


Jasper Taylor a écrit :
> nth and nth0 do not work when the position is a number but the list is 
> free. Examples (on Ubuntu but MacOS is same I think):
>
> jaspert@spacehopper:~$ gprolog
> GNU Prolog 1.3.2
> By Daniel Diaz
> Copyright (C) 1999-2009 Daniel Diaz
> | ?- nth(1,B,c).
>
> no
> | ?- nth0(0,B,c).
>
> no
>
> Working examples:
>
> | ?- nth(A,B,c).
>
> A = 1
> B = [c|_] ? ;
>
> A = 2
> B = [_,c|_] ? ;
>
> A = 3
> B = [_,_,c|_] ?
>
> yes
> | ?- nth0(A,B,c).
>
> A = 0
> B = [c|_] ?
>
> yes
>
> Cheers
>    --Jasper
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-prolog mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-prolog
>


-- 
Ce message a ete verifie par MailScanner
pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de
suspect n'a ete trouve.