Re: Regression on portray_clause/2

Daniel Diaz <[email protected]> Sat, 25 Aug 2012 12:15:50 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.prolog.bugs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thanks for the bug report.
You fix seems you. I check it asap.

Daniel


Le 24 août 2012 à 14:37, Thierry Martinez a écrit :

> Hi,
> 
> With GNU Prolog 1.4.1, portray_clause/2 ignores its second argument and
> prints the its first argument (supposed to be a stream) as
> portray_clause/1 would do.
> 
> The culprit seems to be the line 57 of src/BipsPl/pretty.pl which calls
>  '$call_c'('Pl_Portray_Clause_2'(SorA, Term, AboveB)),
> instead of
>  '$call_c'('Pl_Portray_Clause_3'(SorA, Term, AboveB)),
> 
> This bug was not present in GNU Prolog 1.4.0.
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Thierry.
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-prolog mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-prolog


-- 
Ce message a ete verifie par MailScanner
pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de
suspect n'a ete trouve.