Re: sub_atom fails?
David Logan <[email protected]> Sun, 2 Jul 2017 23:44:46 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.prolog.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Well, it doesn’t seem to be sub_atom as far as it goes. I wrote my own left() in order to do the same job, and the new code still fails with atom table full. At this point, I could use some direction as to why this may be happening. I do not see any nesting situation that would cause this. It appears to me that as I backtrack to the repeat clause, it should remove the atoms that are no longer in use. David Logan > On Jul 2, 2017, at 3:07 PM, David Logan <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am trying to use sub_atom to get a substring. It fails with “atom table full.” When I remove that single line and instead hard code some value to “NewPrefix”, it works fine (other than not writing the correct words of course.) Is this a bug, or does anyone know why this would be legitimately failing? > > I am not sure how this will arrive at users inboxes, so let me state that I am trying to attach two files: The test prolog file, and the input file I am using. > > Thank you, > David Logan > > > <test5.pl> > <wordlist.txt> _______________________________________________ Users-prolog mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/users-prolog