Re: Problems with RADWHO
"Eduardo Tavares" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.radius.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <004101c59e77$cbb2b2b0$af1810ac@vmax> |
GREAT! Lots of thanks! I didn´t used radius1 yet, because radius0 was supplying my proposes. Thank you again! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sergey Poznyakoff" <[email protected]> To: "Eduardo Tavares" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 9:15 AM Subject: Re: Problems with RADWHO > Eduardo Tavares <[email protected]> wrote: > >> When I upgraded to GNU/Radius 1.3 and when I do the same command. It just >> returns only the strings. >> login:20, nas:20 >> login:20, nas:20 >> login:20, nas:20 >> login:20, nas:20 >> What is happening? > > The correct argument for -o switch is '(login 20) (nas-address 20)'. > > The format of -f argument has changed in version 1.0. See file NEWS, near > line 509, for information about the change and > http://www.gnu.org/software/radius/manual/html_node/radius_135.html#SEC237 > for a detailed discussion of `radwho' formats. > > Regards, > Sergey >