Re: screen-users Digest, Vol 1212, Issue 1

Edward Peschko <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.screen.user
Message-ID <CAH+_n-62xNeL5ri0qbJk3BVJAnt5T9G7ZBUziBXjC7Ugbwo72A@mail.gmail.com>
>
> It could certainly be done with an external script, using features
> from 4.1.0. For example, pipe the output of screen_hardcopy.sh to a
> script, which queries Screen for the current window number and provides
> a customised interface for searching.
>

I guess I'm unclear as to why one would want to make users to do this in an
external script. Searching through all windows for a string - and then
switching to the window where that string is found - is a commonly enough
used metaphor to warrant being integrated into screen itself, the usage that
I suggested was simple and easily enough remembered.

Also, searching through a file with buffer contents is not the same as
using search to
switch contexts - I often don't know the name of the screen I want to
switch to; I just
know that it has a certain string in it. Being able to switch based on
its content is an
incredibly useful way to manage a large quantity of screens.

And even if a script equivalent to the features that I want could be
written, such a script would
only give a small subset of screen users the multi-windowsearch
functionality; integrating
it into screen itself would make everybody benefit.

There are other features that screen should support natively which
have been irksome:
multiple, named, buffers for one. (why force only one buffer to be
set/accessed (key combo ctrl-a ]?
why not supplement this with ctrl - a \ <letter> to get 52?)

I understand the problem with maintainer's time.. but it is
frustrating not having new features
to play around with. Is there at least a packaged alpha release to
play around with? I don't
see any new files in the gnu download directory, and I'm hesitant to
use the git cutting edge branch..

Ed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.