Re: Any difference between `screen -r` vs `screen -x` when attaching to an already attached session?
Dun Peal <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.screen.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAD03jn61HWhE8iGikzjs0fBAkCiMxwQtc-JafacaFe299Aa=PA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Clark Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > For a detached session I think `screen -r' and `screen -x' are doing the > same thing. > If that's the case, I'll just use `screen -x` always. This is because of my use-case: I am using this for a multiple display setup, where each display has multiple multiple active terminal tabs. When I decide to attach to a session, it means I want to be able to use it on a particular display, inside a particular terminal tab. It doesn't really matter whether it's already attached on other displays and terminals, and if it is, then it is attached there for a good reason, and I want to keep it thus attached (rather than detach it with -dr). Hope that makes sense, and thanks, D. _______________________________________________ screen-users mailing list screen-users-mXXj517/[email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users