Re: pam on OS X

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

William Pursell wrote:
> On OS X (on my box at least), the pam headers are in
> /usr/include/pam rather than in /usr/include/security,
> so defining USE_PAM causes the build to fail.
> 
> Is pam support robust?  I've patched the source
> to compile, but I'm wondering:  do many people
> use screen's pam support?

I imagine most GNU/Linux installations use it. As to whether it's
robust, I doubt I'd describe any part of Screen as "robust".

That being said, PAM support doesn't seem like a complex thing to
implement. Some say it can be complex to _configure_...

- --
Micah J. Cowan
Programmer, musician, typesetting enthusiast, gamer.
GNU Maintainer: wget, screen, teseq
http://micah.cowan.name/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAklk1cUACgkQ7M8hyUobTrFxaQCePgHBb+SoP5WtAUVA5XZv1kxE
DzwAnisIfEUA8ZlTfd7tZhdLuWzlVcx2
=2jrV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----