Re: Order of definitions in source-highlight 2.10

[email protected] wrote:
> Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
>> What about the other changes?
>> Do you think they make sense?
> 
> It seems to work well.  If my understanding is correct, the end result
> should be the same as it was with versions 2.9 and earlier (although the
> implementation is now quite different).
> 

Actually, it might not be exactly the same (but I've also updated many 
.lang files).  Previously, it all relied on a big regular expression 
with many alternatives, and so it relied on the regular expression 
machine to select the most appropriate one, which I don't think it's the 
same of the current one.  However, the current one (which is a manual 
implementation of the selection of the right regular expression) is 
targeted to programming languages (the fact that the prefix only 
contains spaces).

cheers
	Lorenzo

-- 
Lorenzo Bettini, PhD in Computer Science, DI, Univ. Torino
ICQ# lbetto, 16080134     (GNU/Linux User # 158233)
HOME: http://www.lorenzobettini.it MUSIC: http://www.purplesucker.com
http://www.myspace.com/supertrouperabba
BLOGS: http://tronprog.blogspot.com  http://longlivemusic.blogspot.com
http://www.gnu.org/software/src-highlite
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengetopt
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengen http://doublecpp.sourceforge.net