Re: Support for Google Protocol Buffers protobuf language (.proto)
Joel Smith <[email protected]> Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:01:33 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.source-highlight.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Lorenzo Bettini wrote: > don't excuse yourself, it was my fault to leave around autogen.sh > which is quite old and I haven't been using it for years myself: I'll > remove it asap :) Thanks for being responsive. > and many thanks for your patch with proto language definition file. > By the way, many compliments for the way you wrote the patch: together > with all modifications to the configuration files and with the test > for the test suite, well done indeed :) Anything a contributor can do to make it easier for the program's author increases the likelihood of the patch being accepted, right? It was really nice to work with a system that is well designed so that supporting a new syntax was almost trivially easy. Thanks for the great program! Which reminds me, I missed at least one thing that needed to be updated for protobufs... the docs. This snippet should be added to my earlier patch: diff --git a/doc/index.html b/doc/index.html index 499f4d7..d063ed3 100644 --- a/doc/index.html +++ b/doc/index.html @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ supported <li> <i>Postscript</i></li> <li> <i>Prolog</i></li> <li> <i>Properties files</i></li> +<li> <i>Protobuf</i></li> <li> <i>Python</i></li> <li> <i>RPM Spec files</i></li> <li> <i>Ruby</i></li> Thanks, Joel