Re: Embedding inputlang as information

On 04/04/2011 09:56 AM, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> thank you for replying.
>>
>>> Hi there
>>>
>>> I still haven't had time to work on this.  However, your patch looks
>>> OK.  As I said in my previous email I think I will not add that
>>> additional argument in the constructor, but make it settable in a set
>>> method in order not to break compatibility, or probably add an
>>> overloaded constructor with the additional parameter.
>>
>> Implementing with the overloaded constructor aproach is much easier for
>> me. I'll submit the patch.
>
> Instread of overloading, I've written a patch which uses default value for
> parameter.

thanks

however the signature of constructor and method have changed thus it is 
not backward-compatible.  I'll deal with this when I apply the patch.

cheers
	Lorenzo

-- 
Lorenzo Bettini, PhD in Computer Science, DI, Univ. Torino
ICQ# lbetto, 16080134     (GNU/Linux User # 158233)
HOME: http://www.lorenzobettini.it MUSIC: http://www.purplesucker.com
http://www.myspace.com/supertrouperabba
BLOGS: http://tronprog.blogspot.com  http://longlivemusic.blogspot.com
http://www.gnu.org/software/src-highlite
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengetopt
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengen http://doublecpp.sourceforge.net