Re: Installing without root privileges in /usr/local
Adam Spiers <[email protected]> Sat, 10 Mar 2012 18:13:01 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.stow.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOkDyE9MMVqqL9QoLhrFfHKOROc-vZbuttSq2Df8wkcVOb77pQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:31 PM, enclair <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 8 mars 2012 12:45, Adam Spiers <[email protected]> a =E9crit : >> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 2:01 AM, enclair <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Le 6 mars 2012 23:49, Adam Spiers <[email protected]> a =E9crit : >> >> That should work fine, as per >> >> >> >> =A0http://www.gnu.org/software/stow/manual/html_node/Compile_002dtime= -vs-Install_002dtime.html#Compile_002dtime-vs-Install_002dtime >> > >> > I don't understand this part. >> >> What don't you understand exactly? > > For instance this sentence: "Some software packages allow you to specify,= at > compile-time, separate locations for installation and for run-time". > It is stow which allows to have separate locations for installation and r= un > time, not the package. Actually it's both, e.g. make install DESTDIR=3D$RPM_BUILD_ROOT > Another thing I don't understand is the GNU Emacs example. > The documentation mention the "new" prefix, but never the old prefix. So = I > don't know which is the value of the old prefix, and which is the value o= f > the new prefix. The "old" prefix is the value specified to ./configure, which 'make install' will use by default if the "new" prefix is not given. I agree the wording could be improved. > Finally, I don't understand how is it related to this thread. I only mentioned that chapter to clarify the distinction between compile-time and run-time paths, but it is now clear to me that you already understood the difference.