Re: FYI: a couple of stow extensions/alternatives
Adam Spiers <[email protected]> Tue, 1 Oct 2019 15:20:58 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.stow.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOkDyE8bsCTDmfunowf+bAa3djbtZ1cagmM=h3zXc4Bfi6DQng@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 15:13, <[email protected]> wrote: > hello > > my 5 cents, as an end user > > > This looks like an effort to turn Stow into a more fully-blown package > > manager. Personally I do not believe there is a good future for Stow > > in this direction, because there are already several package managers > > out there which already do this job very well, e.g. rpm and dpkg. > > I've also heard very good things about Nix and GNU Guix but not looked > > at them personally. > > > > This is the reason why I changed Stow's web page and manuals to > > relabel Stow as a "symlink farm manager", because its scope is clearly > > limited to that. That new description encompasses other use cases > > for which Stow has been popular for years, such as managing dot files > > in user home directories. > > I have always appreciated the simplicity of stow: in my opinion that is > one of its great advantages (no deps, written in an interpreted > language) > > And yes, pushing stow into a package manager would be > inappropriate, for the reasons mentioned above > > As many other unix tools, I've always considered stow as a great tool, > which makes the hard and dirty job, but leaves room for the user to > integrate it smoothly into his own environment and everyday workflow > > I vote for stow as is and thank you very much its maintainer for the > valuable work > > > ciao > gabriele Thanks a lot Gabriele :-)