Re: GNU sed maintainers, please document GNU sed's "-E" option (which is now in POSIX)
John Cowan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.utils.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bruce Korb scripsit: > If you put several fewer gallons of water into a tub, > then you have less water in the tub. "fewer" is for > stuff you can count, "less" for stuff you don't count. > "backslashes" and "gallons" are countable. OT, but this is not the whole truth but an oversimplification. Quantities and amounts such as time, distance, and money take "less", and have for a thousand years, but less than (not "fewer than") two thousand years. Thus "10 items or less" in the checkout line is correct, because it's the total amount that's relevant, not the individual items. In addition, the number 1 is a special case; "one fewer backslash" is unidiomatic, and has to be "one less backslash" or "one backslash fewer". -- That you can cover for the plentiful John Cowan and often gaping errors, misconstruals, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan and disinformation in your posts [email protected] through sheer volume -- that is another misconception. --Mike to Peter