Re: RFE: upgrade 'sed' RE's to include perlre syntax.
"Linda A. Walsh" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.utils.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jose E. Marchesi wrote: > > Yes, indeed part of the work is already done and part of the GNU sed > tarball (search for REG_PERL). Though the option was -R, not -P. > > I want to release a new version of sed this August (it is time!) and I > would love to include this functionality on it. I think it is not too > late to use -P instead of -R, to keep some uniformity with the other > tools. > Awesome. I don't have a heavy preference on -R v. -P, but trying to keep similar function switches the same between tools would be a bonus. It is REALLY a headache remember what the switch is to specify the "delimiter" char in sort, vs. cut, et al...I seem to always pick the wrong one.