Re: bug on shar (GNU sharutils) 4.15.2
Paulo Ney de Souza <[email protected]> Sat, 27 Nov 2021 18:26:34 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.utils.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFVhNZOHK+KXW-H66iSpaSy5gDpo-zYjBe619aYAX8L-1f-Uyw@mail.gmail.com> |
... but above all what is most disturbing is the fact that it acts erratically on similar files. It works on some files and the you add a character and it no longer works -- this is crazy! Paulo Ney On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 5:28 PM Paulo Ney de Souza <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > Thanks for writing back. > > On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 1:33 PM Bruce Korb <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Quoting the man page: >> >> If you have files with non-ascii bytes or text that some mail >> handling >> programs do not like, you may find difficulties. However, if you are >> using FTP or SSH/SCP, the non-conforming text files should be okay. >> >> "Don't do that." Perhaps I should augment that caveat with the fact that >> the shell program may also play around with the input characters. >> > > Yeah .. but if you are doing only SCP you should be able to shar/unshar > completely fine, and get back the same file you started with. No? > > It clearly states: > > > .............................................................................However, > if you are > using FTP or SSH/SCP, the non-conforming text files should be okay. > > >> >> FYI, the "-T" flag says to open the file in "binary mode": >> > > But -T stands for: > > -T, --text-files > treat all files as text. This option is a member of the > mixed- > uuencode class of options. > > was that a good choice for the flag abbreviation? > > > The file data are then read and written directly into the output shell >> script -- since no encoding is done. The shell script is written thus: >> > > I understand! But we should either make the program do what the > man page says or vice-versa, no? > > Paulo Ney >