Re: gcc warnings

On 04/17/2012 08:02 AM, h.g. muller wrote:
> Wow, changing the default flags sure caused a lot of new warnings.
> A lot of the implicit declarations were indeed pointing out code
> deficiencies
> (prototype in a non-included header, or no prototype at all). I fixed
> all of these.
> In some cases it was best to actually move the routine to another file.
> 
> I fixed the warnings in MenuNameToItem and for saveAnimate.
> 
> I also had a look to the warnings about signedness and char used as index,
> and I think these are appropriately solved now too. If I now do a standard
> 'make', it is completely free of warnings again.

anything in there worth porting to the v4.6.x branch? In that case we
could include it in 4.6.2

ARUN