RE[2]: xboard : classical chess: graphics assets : donation : preferred/desirable license?

[email protected] Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:08:24 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.xboard.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
------=_Part_781_173012927.1613124504
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

GPL is a license for computer source code. I don't think it is suitable f=
or graphics files.=0APerhaps someone that knows more about licenses in ge=
neral than me can suggest a good license.=0AOp vr., feb. 12, 2021 om 10:5=
7, "[email protected]"  schreef:=0AThanks for the detailed response.=0ACa=
n graphics assets be released under the GPL?=0AIf yes, any advice on how =
to choose between v2 and v3 would be welcome.=0AIf no, any advice on a su=
itable license for free use and redistribution would be welcome.=0A=0AOn =
Friday, February 12, 2021 02:21 PM IST, [email protected] (mailto:h.g.=
[email protected]) wrote: =0A=0AThe main version of XBoard has been GTK ba=
sed for many years now. But all versions of XBoard use the same graphics =
formats. The primary format is SVG, so the images can be used for any boa=
rd size. XBoard would also be able to use PNG format, but this can be use=
d only for one particular board size without loss of image quality.=0ACom=
patibility of licences is no issue, as the graphics files are not part of=
 the program binary, but loaded as external data. The XBoard licence (GPL=
) does not put any restrictions as to what data the program would be allo=
wed to process. So the only thing that matters is whether the graphics fi=
les can be freely used and redistributed.=0AOp vr., feb. 12, 2021 om 07:5=
2, "[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])"  schreef:=0Aan associat=
e of mine is considering freeing the graphics assets he'd got developed f=
or one of his commercial chess product.=0Aif those assets (board + pieces=
) have to be usable (maybe as default) with xboard, which license is the =
most compatible for releasing them? Also, which image format should he re=
lease them as to allow quick and easy integration with the existing xboar=
d (as opposed to the upcoming gtk+ based)?

------=_Part_781_173012927.1613124504
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"t=
ext/html; charset=3Dutf-8" /></head><body><div data-crea=3D"font-wrapper"=
 style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 16px; direction: ltr"><div>GPL =
is a license for computer source code. I don't think it is suitable for g=
raphics files.</div><div><br></div><div>Perhaps someone that knows more a=
bout licenses in general than me can suggest a good license.<br></div><di=
v style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 16px"></div><br><br><div></div=
><br><br><div data-anchor=3D"reply-title">Op vr., feb. 12, 2021 om 10:57,=
 "[email protected]" &lt;[email protected]&gt; schreef:</div><blockquote>=
<div>Thanks for the detailed response.<br>Can graphics assets be released=
 under the GPL?<br>If yes, any advice on how to choose between v2 and v3 =
would be welcome.<br>If no, any advice on a suitable license for free use=
 and redistribution would be welcome.<br><br>On Friday, February 12, 2021=
 02:21 PM IST, <a target=3D"_blank" href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">=
[email protected]</a> wrote: <br><br><blockquote>The main version of X=
Board has been GTK based for many years now. But all versions of XBoard u=
se the same graphics formats. The primary format is SVG, so the images ca=
n be used for any board size. XBoard would also be able to use PNG format=
, but this can be used only for one particular board size without loss of=
 image quality.<br>Compatibility of licences is no issue, as the graphics=
 files are not part of the program binary, but loaded as external data. T=
he XBoard licence (GPL) does not put any restrictions as to what data the=
 program would be allowed to process. So the only thing that matters is w=
hether the graphics files can be freely used and redistributed.<br>Op vr.=
, feb. 12, 2021 om 07:52, "<a target=3D"_blank" href=3D"mailto:mayuresh@k=
athe.in">[email protected]</a>"=C2=A0=C2=A0schreef:<br>an associate of mi=
ne is considering freeing the graphics assets he'd got developed for one =
of his commercial chess product.<br>if those assets (board + pieces) have=
 to be usable (maybe as default) with xboard, which license is the most c=
ompatible for releasing them? Also, which image format should he release =
them as to allow quick and easy integration with the existing xboard (as =
opposed to the upcoming gtk+ based)?</blockquote></div></blockquote></div=
></body></html>

------=_Part_781_173012927.1613124504--