Re: [Xorg] Chromium vs GLX protocol
Keith Whitwell <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.chromium.devel,gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Adam Jackson wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thursday 29 July 2004 11:17, Alex Deucher wrote: > >>couldn't chromium be merged into xorg someday to provide multi-head >>open GL in conjunction with dmx on the same box or different boxes? >>Say you have two 3d cards each could be brought up as independant X >>servers with their own instances of the DRI. Then chromium and DMX >>could provide the middle layer so that multi-card hw Open GL would >>just work for a xinerama desktop. > > > Heh. It won't be hardware-accelerated until we ditch GLcore for *_dri.so in > the server. DMX just uses whatever indirect rendering path the server > provides. There's a reason this is on my todo list ;) Chromium provides accelerated rendering over the network, but the current interfaces are designed to support all manner of complex setups and don't have the convenience of things like "DISPLAY=thathost:0 glxgears". Keith ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com