Re: Windows app_faker

Daniel E. Shipton wrote:
> The Windows app_faker seems to be severely limited in what it can do 
> (compared to other platforms).  Applications that have their own data to 
> load do not work very well because of the temporary infrastructure that 
> Chromium sets up to run it.  How do most people deal with this issue?  I 
> would like to see the Chromium not specify the application to run in the 
> mothership config file and instead let the user run the app_faker 
> /with/the/path/to/what/they/want/to/run .  I don't see why this would be 
> a problem(on All platforms). I find it quite unnatural to specify the 
> file path to a Windows executable from a config file.  Thoughts? Comments?

Not being a Windows user, I'm not sure of the story behind this.  But 
what you say sounds reasonable.  Maybe someone more familiar with this 
can comment.

I'm hoping to _finally_ release Cr 1.9 this week and, in the interest 
of stability, don't want to make any big changes right now.

-Brian

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642