Re: using chromium and glew?
Alan Hourihane <[email protected]> Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:27:59 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.chromium.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | Tungsten Graphics, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <1205148479.5242.31.camel@localhost> |
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 12:16 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > > Alan Hourihane wrote: > > > that is why i try to find out why glewInit() claims to fail (read: not > > being able to determine which extensions are/openGL version is supported) > > ok, i was able to narrow the problem down. > > the problem is in some glx-initialisation routine. > glew tries to get the pointer to glXGetCurrentDisplay() by issuing > glXGetProcAddressARB((const GLubyte*)"glXGetCurrentDisplay") > > on my normal system (without chromium) this returns the address of the > function call. > when running chromium, this calls returns 0 > > > luckily (for me) i currently don't use the glx extension wrangler of > GLEW, so i have no _real_ problems. > > nevertheless i am wondering, why i don't get the correct address when > using chromium (i guess it will turn into a problem, once somebody wants > to use glew for glx extension checking in combination with chromium) > > any hints? In the opengl_stub/getprocaddress.py code we never return any glX*() functions for glXGetProcAddress() which actually translates into crGetProcAddress(). It's should just be a matter of adding glX*() functions to this so that Chromium can return the appropriate address. Alan. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/