Re: A few observations and questions regarding iModifiable entries
Christian Van Brussel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.crystalspace.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | UCL - TELE |
| Message-ID | <1338299631.2012.1754.camel@scylla> |
On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 15:48 +0200, Christian Van Brussel wrote: > Yes clearly. Every implementation of the iModifiable will use quite a > lot of code that can be commonly shared in a tool class. The design of > such tool classes is however still not clear, and this may be made once > you implemented a first set of iModifiable's, so that we can see what > are the actual needs. Mmm, actually, maybe all the description part of the parameters (iModifiableDescription, iModifiableParameter, etc) can be defined in XML and parsed from a generic tool. Only the iModifiable interface would need to be implemented by new objects willing to be modified. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/