Re: [Fwd: [Crystal-cvs] SF.net SVN: crystal:[38136] CS/branches/soc2012/editor]

Hello Christian,

> The better to test it with a 3D canvas is with the cseditor. I'm still 
> working on it, I'm a bit slow, I know :), but it's getting closer and 
> closer. Meanwhile, there is still the event system, the translations 
> and the slider that can be done. Also, the classes in varedittest are 
> currently very badly named for historical reasons, can you change that?

Yes, I'll take care of that. Should I also remove the redundant 
Graph-related classes that litter the source code right now? Like 
GraphLink, Graph, GraphNode, MyGraphNode1, etc.?

>> I believe it would make sense to edit
>> all the code itself, since I don't think that merging it back into the
>> trunk with just the added implementation of iModifiable would break
>> anything.
> Not sure of what you mean here, but in all cases, you should probably keep
> your work within your branch, and edit the particle and whatever other
> files within it.
There was an option of copying that code, and implementing alternative 
versions for particle stuff that are iModifiable. I don't think it makes 
sense anyway, so never mind. Sorry for not thinking things through and 
sounding confusing. :P
> The cleanest might be to use a switch but this may not be possible at all,
> because the potential ID value's are not available at compilation time.
>
> Some other suggestions?
>
Would macros be too nasty?

Regards,
Andrei Bârsan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/