Re: [Crystal-cvs] SF.net SVN: crystal:[38394] CS/trunk/include/csutil/vararg.h
"res" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.crystalspace.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 06:05:10 -0400 > Von: Eric Sunshine <[email protected]> > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [Crystal-develop] [Crystal-cvs] SF.net SVN: crystal:[38394] CS/trunk/include/csutil/vararg.h > I have implemented this approach. It's cleaner than the va_call() > solution and requires less churn and less maintenance. If we are okay > with these few SCF interfaces being non-pure, I will finish polishing > the changes and commit. > > Opinions? Probably unsurprising: I'm fine with having SCF interfaces that contain inline functions. ;) (I changed the docs to make note of the acceptability of small helper/convenience inline methods.) Don't forget that the SCF interface version should be bumped if (virtual) methods are removed. (I don't think you did when implementing the va_call() approach.) -f.r. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/