Re: Changing iEngine::CreatePortalContainer signature

res <[email protected]> Thu, 09 Jan 2014 22:56:52 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.graphics.crystalspace.devel
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On 09.01.2014 17:07, Matthieu Kraus wrote:
> Well, it would be an edge case if we had an empty (but valid) bbox for  
> such meshes located at their position - or well, at least from a  
> culling point of view, as we could actually test it for visibility  
> then. However as it stands now it pretty much is invalid, so I'm not  
> sure what to make out of it.

What about skipping culling for meshes returning an invalid (max < min)
or empty meshes? They could simply be treated invisible.

-f.r.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between.
Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk

_______________________________________________
Crystal-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crystal-develop

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 246 B)