Re: [CsMain] New website design and infrastructure
Mike Gist <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.crystalspace.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11 October 2010 18:08, Christian Van Brussel < [email protected]> wrote: > I think Drupal would be a better choice than > > Mediawiki, as it is much easier to make it feel like a "normal" site, > > and not like a slightly mis-used wiki. > > There are many reasons to not try to switch to another Content Management > System, Frank has listed many of them on the mailing list during this last > year. It's therefore probably better to not switch to something else > unless really needed. Keeping MediaWiki can seem less easy to manage, but > I guess that all the problems that may arise while switching to another > CMS can overtake this. > I don't think that switching to something new is a problem if all the content gets transferred over. Only Denis and whoever else wants to work on it know whether this is likely to succeed :) I agree with Denis that Drupal would be a better choice of CMS. -- - Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ Crystal-main mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crystal-main Unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe