Re: Backport request for 6.0.4 release version
sfgphm <[email protected]> Sat, 13 Dec 2025 06:14:19 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.gnuplot.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACkqsg+wTph-qM077jmdZ761zP6XxtG_ORdOPWg_GDnmrmi3Ag@mail.gmail.com> |
--===============1700958011473246562== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004a85930645c7bf95" --0000000000004a85930645c7bf95 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Ethan, I can confirm that all four issues in the test script have been resolved with commit [4d3398fdd] to branch-6.0-stable. Thank you very much for taking the time to backport this non-trivial fix. Best regards, H. Motoyoshi On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 8:17=E2=80=AFAM Ethan A Merritt <[email protected]> wr= ote: > On Tuesday, 9 December 2025 15:20:28 PST sfhm wrote: > > Dear Ethan, > > > > I would like to request a backport to the 6.0.4 release. > > > > I have observed differences in polygon color rendering between the > > development version and previous release versions (including > > 6.0.4-testing). The development version renders polygons with the > intended > > colors, while the release versions render them with different colors. > > [snip example] > > > If the fix for this issue in the development version is sufficiently > > stable, I would greatly appreciate its backport to the 6.0.4 release, > even > > if only for some of the cases rather than all of them. > > Unfortunately, that is not a trivial change. > > The code that deals with how fill color and border color are specified, > stored, and eventually applied to graphical elements in the plot has > diverged between 6.0 and the development branch. > > A partial list of relevant commits in 6.1 that do not apply cleanly to 6.= 0 > c92721 fc9818 > > Nevertheless, it is possible that the specific cases of "splot with > polygons" > in your test script could be handled either by some subset of the changes > currently in the development branch or by some ad hoc fixes for 6.0. > The trick is not to break anything else. > > I will look into it, but no promises about 6.0.4. > > Ethan > > > --0000000000004a85930645c7bf95 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr">Dear Ethan,<div><br></div><div>I can confirm that all four= issues in the test script have been resolved with commit [4d3398fdd] to br= anch-6.0-stable.=C2=A0</div><div>Thank you very much for taking the time to= backport this non-trivial fix.</div><div><br></div><div>Best regards,</div= ><div>H. Motoyoshi</div></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote gmail_quote_con= tainer"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 8:17= =E2=80=AFAM Ethan A Merritt <<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">merritt@u= w.edu</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"ma= rgin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:= 1ex">On Tuesday, 9 December 2025 15:20:28 PST sfhm wrote:<br> > Dear Ethan,<br> > <br> > I would like to request a backport to the 6.0.4 release.<br> > <br> > I have observed differences in polygon color rendering between the<br> > development version and previous release versions (including<br> > 6.0.4-testing). The development version renders polygons with the inte= nded<br> > colors, while the release versions render them with different colors.<= br> <br> [snip example] <br> <br> > If the fix for this issue in the development version is sufficiently<b= r> > stable, I would greatly appreciate its backport to the 6.0.4 release, = even<br> > if only for some of the cases rather than all of them.<br> <br> Unfortunately, that is not a trivial change.=C2=A0 <br> <br> The code that deals with how fill color and border color are specified,<br> stored, and eventually applied to graphical elements in the plot has<br> diverged between 6.0 and the development branch.<br> <br> A partial list of relevant commits in 6.1 that do not apply cleanly to 6.0<= br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 c92721 fc9818 <br> <br> Nevertheless, it is possible that the specific cases of "splot with po= lygons"<br> in your test script could be handled either by some subset of the changes<b= r> currently in the development branch or by some ad hoc fixes for 6.0.<br> The trick is not to break anything else.<br> <br> I will look into it, but no promises about 6.0.4.=C2=A0 <br> <br> =C2=A0Ethan<br> <br> <br> </blockquote></div> --0000000000004a85930645c7bf95-- --===============1700958011473246562== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline --===============1700958011473246562== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ gnuplot-beta mailing list [email protected] Membership management via: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnuplot-beta --===============1700958011473246562==--