Re: tex terminals, some issues

On 19/05/2024 10:03, Ethan Merritt wrote:
> First some background.

My thanks and my apologies. I sincerely 
appreciate that exposition, but I should've been 
more specific, too, it seems.

I knew about multiplication factors and when 
testing, I've set all of those to 1.0, and I've 
expressed all sizes (as appropriate) in metric 
units. E.g. line width 50mm as 72.0/25.4*50.

Then I've output the resulting PS and/or PDF to 
screen and measured things with a ruler. Also 
checked in the resulting PS and uncompressed PDF 
to see sizes of things as expressed in points, 
however much of that I could understand.

> If you are unhappy with the default settings, you can change them when
> you select the terminal.

Thing is, all scalable terminals seem to do 
their own thing with sizes. With 
`postscript+eps` we at least know something 
*determinate* in advance. With other ones, nope.

Posting this, I'm sort of hoping developers 
would give the matter a look, if possible. 
Undocumented behaviour

> You can set the tic format to whatever you want.
> The default format for latex terminal output is "$%h$",

Somehow I've imagined that format to be 
hardcoded in tex terminals. Nice.

> Does that help?

Thank you. Also, see the 1st paragraph of this 
reply. Thank you, regardless.

-Yury


_______________________________________________
gnuplot-info mailing list
[email protected]
Membership management via: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnuplot-info