Re: The evil is out ... aPNG (Animated PNG)
Glenn Randers-Pehrson <[email protected]> Sun, 29 Aug 2004 08:01:09 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.mng.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 11:44 AM 8/29/2004 +0200, you wrote: >On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 18:13:08 +0200 Alexander Opitz <opitz-MXccdyw32Q/[email protected]> >wrote: > >> Take a look --> >> http://www.pavlov.net/blog/archives/2004/08/apng_coming_soo.html > >The main argument in favor of this seems to be implementation size (5k vs >200k, although the 5k obviously does not include libpng). Does someone >have a guesstimate as to how an implementation of MNG-VLC or MNG-LC would >compare with that? >This whole thing looks like a reinvention of MNG-VLC. A MNG-VLC implementation using libmng is about 75k. MNG-LC is about 93k. By comparison, libmng in mozilla-1.4 is 105k. I have since cut it down to about 45k, to make room for MNG. That didn't work though; the result was they ratcheted down the target size for MNG. Glenn -- Send the message body "help" to [email protected]