Re: Proportional line width, precise anchor points
Kenneth Prager <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.omnigraffle.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <p06240802c69e72f7e3df@[192.168.6.4]> |
At 5:02 PM -0400 8/4/09, Sean Ahern wrote: >I would like to reproduce this graph (or something like it) in OmniGraffle: > >http://www.scientificcomputing.com/uploadedImages/Images/0907/sc090727h_lg%282%29.jpg > >I'm not sure I can. The biggest problem has to do with the >proportional spacing of the lines and how they attach to the boxes. >While I have manually entered the lines thickness, I don't see any >way to get them to attach to their end boxes so that their >thicknesses is taken in account with their attachment. > >For example, look at the "Coal" box on the left. There is a fat >line going to "Electricity Generation" and a thin line going to >"Industrial". Those two lines should be spaced on the "Coal" box so >that the little line attaches under the big line. > >Anchors would be a way to do this, but I don't see an method other >than manually clicking the box to attach a magnet. That's imprecise >and would be a real headache when trying to do the "Electricity >Generation" box, for instance. > >Any thoughts? This doesn't help you but line magnets (as opposed to point magnets) are what is called for here. They are a feature that I've been asking for for years. Ken P.