Re: Microsoft suggests using abort() instead of ExitProcess(0)

John Bowler <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.graphics.png.devel
Message-ID <CAP7U399n6d5c5ed+eo7ue8=xq8g4of2R_4Yt2njH95dJbuEwpQ@mail.gmail.com>
I agree completely with Glenn.  The original code was there because at
least one official version of Windows (it might have been Windows CE)
had a defective C library which did not include a number of ISO C-90
functions.

There always was a better fix anyway; for OS implementations that do
not offer C-90 conformant library code write wrapper functions
specific to the OS and link with that.  There are very very few, if
any, such operating systems these days.

John Bowler

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.