Re: libpng version 2.0, anyone?
Cosmin Truta <[email protected]> Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:31:22 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.png.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAoVtZzfzE1CxXh1mD30UnOic_2xmZQJkq4CGnu3zqm6wGdSQA@mail.gmail.com> |
--===============7983867505415734411== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005ec59606227df88c" --0000000000005ec59606227df88c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 9:37=E2=80=AFPM Andrew Randrianasulu wrote: > But what exactly is missing? Animated pngs? It's the 3rd edition of the PNG specification, which is currently a W3C Candidate Recommendation: https://www.w3.org/TR/png-3/ Most of these are missing from libpng, including animated PNG indeed. Sincerely, Cosmin --0000000000005ec59606227df88c Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr">On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 9:37=E2=80=AFPM Andrew Randrianasu= lu wrote:<br><br>> But what exactly is missing? Animated pngs?<br><br>It= 's the 3rd edition of the PNG specification, which is currently a W3C C= andidate Recommendation:<br><div><a href=3D"https://www.w3.org/TR/png-3/">h= ttps://www.w3.org/TR/png-3/</a></div><div><br></div><div>Most of these are = missing from libpng, including animated PNG indeed.<br></div><div><br></div= ><div>Sincerely,</div><div>Cosmin<br></div></div> --0000000000005ec59606227df88c-- --===============7983867505415734411== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline --===============7983867505415734411== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ png-mng-implement mailing list png-mng-implement-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-implement --===============7983867505415734411==--