Re: libpng version 2.0, anyone?

Cosmin Truta <[email protected]> Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:31:22 +0300
Newsgroups gmane.comp.graphics.png.devel
Message-ID <CAAoVtZzfzE1CxXh1mD30UnOic_2xmZQJkq4CGnu3zqm6wGdSQA@mail.gmail.com>
--===============7983867505415734411==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005ec59606227df88c"

--0000000000005ec59606227df88c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 9:37=E2=80=AFPM Andrew Randrianasulu wrote:

> But what exactly is missing? Animated pngs?

It's the 3rd edition of the PNG specification, which is currently a W3C
Candidate Recommendation:
https://www.w3.org/TR/png-3/

Most of these are missing from libpng, including animated PNG indeed.

Sincerely,
Cosmin

--0000000000005ec59606227df88c
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 9:37=E2=80=AFPM Andrew Randrianasu=
lu wrote:<br><br>&gt; But what exactly is missing? Animated pngs?<br><br>It=
&#39;s the 3rd edition of the PNG specification, which is currently a W3C C=
andidate Recommendation:<br><div><a href=3D"https://www.w3.org/TR/png-3/">h=
ttps://www.w3.org/TR/png-3/</a></div><div><br></div><div>Most of these are =
missing from libpng, including animated PNG indeed.<br></div><div><br></div=
><div>Sincerely,</div><div>Cosmin<br></div></div>

--0000000000005ec59606227df88c--


--===============7983867505415734411==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline


--===============7983867505415734411==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
png-mng-implement mailing list
png-mng-implement-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-implement

--===============7983867505415734411==--