Re: EXIF support in PNG [was: Modern compressor]

John Bowler <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.graphics.png.general
Message-ID <CAP7U39_QqQxSy70rm-U70WQ9EAJSvxk24RPd1vbuQ4ux1OHKpQ@mail.gmail.com>
I can't remember what the quorum is, but there should be enough people
still reading the list for a vote.

I expanded what I said very slightly on the original thread where Glenn
explained that {Image,Graphics}Magick are currently doing broadly the same
thing use a zTXt tag and hex encoding.  The fact that this horrible
solution exists and that Cosmin had previously implemented the 'raw'
proposal is pretty good justification for standardization.

I don't know where the authoritative specification of the data is;
apparently JEITA owns it but ideally there would be a reference to an
international standard.

One of the reasons PNG is static is that there are no obvious widely
adopted de facto extensions.  I think this is an exception; several
extensions to do this do exist but they are each different and that is the
criterion standard bodies state for adopting an extension or modification
of a standard.

John Bowler
​

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot

_______________________________________________
png-mng-misc mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.