Re: EXIF support in PNG [was: Modern compressor]
John Bowler <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.png.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAP7U39_QqQxSy70rm-U70WQ9EAJSvxk24RPd1vbuQ4ux1OHKpQ@mail.gmail.com> |
I can't remember what the quorum is, but there should be enough people
still reading the list for a vote.
I expanded what I said very slightly on the original thread where Glenn
explained that {Image,Graphics}Magick are currently doing broadly the same
thing use a zTXt tag and hex encoding. The fact that this horrible
solution exists and that Cosmin had previously implemented the 'raw'
proposal is pretty good justification for standardization.
I don't know where the authoritative specification of the data is;
apparently JEITA owns it but ideally there would be a reference to an
international standard.
One of the reasons PNG is static is that there are no obvious widely
adopted de facto extensions. I think this is an exception; several
extensions to do this do exist but they are each different and that is the
criterion standard bodies state for adopting an extension or modification
of a standard.
John Bowler
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
png-mng-misc mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc