Colorimetry in EXIF
Cosmin Truta <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.png.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAoVtZyf6Hh+h9fstGhH=6XGzVAxyY3AfPcJ-YXBr8HA-Ti9hg@mail.gmail.com> |
[Changed the subject in order not to hijack the main EXIF discussion] On 2 January 2017 at 22:27, John Bowler wrote: > That is correct, the camera information does not relate to the image in the > JPEG (it might to the RAW image, but even that isn't certain). I am by no means an EXIF expert, but from what I know, the colorimetry is about the sensor. Once you have the JPEG, (or TIFF, or PNG) it doesn't matter anymore. If you edit it further, that doesn't count, either. On one hand, if you modify the colorimetry parameters in EXIF (and the raw processing software isn't smart enough to recognize what you tampered with), the colors that get out of raw processing would be off. Conversely, you can alter the raw color processing, be it in camera or in software (e.g. to natural colors, or vivid, or muted, or grayscale, etc.); but the embedded EXIF colorimetry data would still be the same. I haven't used any output color space except for sRGB, but even for other gamuts (e.g. AdobeRGB), I assume that the embedded EXIF colorimetry would still be the same. One additional observation is about the distinction between the colorimetry info stored in the EXIF chunk vs. the info in sRGB/iCCP. The latter is about the output image and how to display it. Sincerely, Cosmin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot