Re: EXIF support in PNG

I could easily update pngtopnm/pngtopam. Don't think there is a need for 
an EXIF creator in pamtopng/pnmtopng. Let me know when you think otherwise.

But are we agreeing on no compression, no header?

Willem





On 2017-01-04 14:54, John Bowler wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Cosmin Truta <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I learned that other standards bodies (most notably, the C Standard
>> Committee and the C++ Standard Committee) only accept proposals backed
>> by actual working implementations, and this has been a practice for a
>> few good years already.
>
> I suspect that it will only take me a couple of hours to patch
> exiftool since I've written the code already.  A demonstration
> shouldn't rely on patching system libraries (e.g. libpng and libexif)
> because we know they don't get updated (well, libpng doesn't).
>
> John Bowler
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> png-mng-misc mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc
>
>

-- 
Willem van Schaik
[email protected]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot