Re: EXIF support in PNG

Willem van Schaik <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.graphics.png.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Glenn wrote:

 > I don't think so.


wow Glenn, you're stubborn ... :-)

the one byte header I don't really like but I can easily live with

I thought we were still talking about a header with some form of 
readable description, I didn't like that idea but just an extra byte is 
no issue

regarding compression or not (you know my preference :) here will be my 
voting strategy:

1) when we're voting including compression my vote on the proposal will 
be NO

but

2a) the proposal gets accepted

2b) the proposal gets rejected because too many others don't like 
compression

2c) the proposal gets rejected but the majority agrees on compression, 
in which case I will switch camps and not object against compression anymore

Alternatively, maybe easier, we vote on two proposals that are nearly 
identical, one with and the other without compression. And we simply 
agree with each other that only one can survive, depending on the number 
of votes.

my $0.02 ...
Willem




-- 
Willem van Schaik
[email protected]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.