Re: EXIF support in PNG

Willem van Schaik <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.graphics.png.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
 > Willem said, I think, that he doesn't mind either way.

let me be loud and clear here, I'm against compression !!

just: EXIF chunk header + raw EXIF data + CRC code, nothing else

but if the majority is in favor of compression then I will not be the 
one who will be the roadblock for the EXIF chunk at all

Willem



On 2017-01-04 18:58, John Bowler wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Glenn Randers-Pehrson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I don't think so.  We want a one-byte header that is always 0 to signify
>> deflate/zlib encoded.
>
> "We" means Cosmin and you.  I haven't heard from anyone else who
> cares; Willem said, I think, that he doesn't mind either way.   I am
> fundamentally opposed to compressing this stuff for the reasons I
> stated.  I will be fascinated and educated when I see a simple
> implementation of the compression.
>
> John Bowler
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> png-mng-misc mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc
>
>

-- 
Willem van Schaik
[email protected]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.