Re: EXIF support in PNG
Willem van Schaik <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.png.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Willem said, I think, that he doesn't mind either way. let me be loud and clear here, I'm against compression !! just: EXIF chunk header + raw EXIF data + CRC code, nothing else but if the majority is in favor of compression then I will not be the one who will be the roadblock for the EXIF chunk at all Willem On 2017-01-04 18:58, John Bowler wrote: > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Glenn Randers-Pehrson <[email protected]> wrote: >> I don't think so. We want a one-byte header that is always 0 to signify >> deflate/zlib encoded. > > "We" means Cosmin and you. I haven't heard from anyone else who > cares; Willem said, I think, that he doesn't mind either way. I am > fundamentally opposed to compressing this stuff for the reasons I > stated. I will be fascinated and educated when I see a simple > implementation of the compression. > > John Bowler > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > png-mng-misc mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc > > -- Willem van Schaik [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot