Re: CALL for DISCUSSION: eXIf 20170115 -- length
Glenn Randers-Pehrson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.png.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+PdXcsMvrtuDcHNu5gRkPOkfKEPXhaibbYHO7aD-4NYFb-oxg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:14 AM, John Bowler <john.cunningham.bowler@gmail. com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Willem van Schaik <[email protected]> > wrote: > > or maybe : > > > > The eXIf chunks four-byte "length" field determines the size of > > the chunks data segment containing the EXIF profile. > > I don't think anything would be lost just by removing the original > sentence. It doesn't seem to say anything that isn't explicit in the > PNG specification. The previous sentence is perfectly clear. Yes, the sentence is left over from the compressed-exif proposal, where the data segment contained more than just the Exif profile. I'll update the proposal later today when I have access to my files. Glenn ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ png-mng-misc mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc