Re: CALL for DISCUSSION: eXIf 20170115 -- length

Willem van Schaik <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.graphics.png.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I would be OK with removing. In its current form it didn't help, but 
just confused.

Willem


On 2017-01-17 00:14, John Bowler wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Willem van Schaik <[email protected]> wrote:
>> or maybe :
>>
>>    The eXIf chunks four-byte "length" field determines the size of
>>    the chunks data segment containing the EXIF profile.
>
> I don't think anything would be lost just by removing the original
> sentence.  It doesn't seem to say anything that isn't explicit in the
> PNG specification.  The previous sentence is perfectly clear.
>
> John Bowler <[email protected]>
> +1 (541) 450-9885
> PO BOX 3151
> KERBY OR 97531-3151
> USA
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> png-mng-misc mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc
>
>

-- 
Willem van Schaik
[email protected]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.