Re: CALL for DISCUSSION: eXIf 20170115

Glenn Randers-Pehrson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.graphics.png.general
Message-ID <CA+PdXcu=++qc1f71T+oRuJ6W1GTPrsdeevjNtvN0yjwufh9vzg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 5:30 PM, John Bowler <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm not going to update my programs; they *write* exIf with the ID
> code.  The previous convention has been to use a likely unique code on
> private chunks to avoid clashing with other uses of the same private
> chunk name, and I think that is a good convention to maintain.


I got a lot of grief from everyone when I had something like that in the
initial proposal.


> It
> doesn't make any difference to the proposal or testing it; skipping or
> adding 6 bytes is easy and the code has to be changed anyway to write
> a public change.
>

I learned about "tail --bytes=+7" last night and used that.

Glenn

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot

_______________________________________________
png-mng-misc mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.