Re: CALL for DISCUSSION: eXIf 20170115
Glenn Randers-Pehrson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.png.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+PdXcugwak6JKhviHdnY1rYvpSPXa_ktustVVJBDiM4MG=nhg@mail.gmail.com> |
The zXIF proposal (compressed or uncompressed Exif) is at ftp://ftp.simplesystems.org/pub/png-group/documents/ png-proposed-zXIf-chunk-2017-0123.html The competing eXIF proposal (uncompressed Exif) is at ftp://ftp.simplesystems.org/pub/png-group/documents/ png-proposed-eXIf-chunk-2017-0119.html Glenn On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 6:23 AM, Glenn Randers-Pehrson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Cosmin Truta <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> One thing that I was planning to do is implement, experimentally, both >> the plain raw uncompressed form (temporarily called "uxIf") and the >> deflate-compressed form (temporarily called "zxIf"), and report on the >> implementation effort. > > > I'm willing to reopen the zxIF proposal. It would differ from the previous > zxIF; proposal in that the first byte would be "I" or "M" for uncompressed > and zero for zlib-compressed, and the "Exif\0\0" ID bytes would be omitted. > > Glenn > >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ png-mng-misc mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc