Re: CALL for DISCUSSION: eXIf 20170115

Jason Summers provided the disambiguation with regard to the format:

"I've seen Exif data in PSD, WebP, and BPG files, and they don't have
this. I'm aware of no formats, other than JPEG, that do."

Indeed; the original proposal is sufficient.  I was mislead by the
*Magick implementation which erroneously includes the stuff from
T-REC-T.86-199806-I which is already covered by the ISO-PNG spec and
the recommendations for PNG private chunks.

Some explanation may be desirable, but it is editorial in nature.

At this point I suggest that it is time to start a vote on the
original proposal, which has not changed since December of last year.
It would be very Putin to call for such a vote myself, so I shall not
do so.

John Bowler

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot