Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION (continued): PNG Registration Process 20170125

Cosmin Truta <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.graphics.png.general
Message-ID <CAAoVtZzxw57HN1LjEOZbG6Tezxr0yF=jVs6w84piWuWdwszo3Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 29 January 2017 at 21:09, John Bowler
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Glenn Randers-Pehrson
>> which happens to be two weeks old at this point.
>> It'd be a little confusing not to be voting on the latest draft, but so be it.
>> I'd vote against this one because of the problem with whether to include
>> Exif\0\0 or not.
>> The 2017-0115 draft seems to say include it.
>
> It's fine that way.  Let's get this over with.

No, I am absolutely not fine with it that way. That was an early
draft, a bad one, and everyone agreed on the subsequent modifications.

I am not fine with the technical content of that early draft, and I
also disagree in principle with doing this just to circumvent the
process and disregarding all the negotiations that have taken place so
far.

Sincerely,
Cosmin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.