Re: CALL for DISCUSSION: eXIf 20170115
Glenn Randers-Pehrson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.png.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+PdXcvPDfnSNnwt3grXfcrf7z_Ktss_WU+Gypsf5m4Vze7whQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:20 AM, Greg Roelofs <[email protected]> wrote: > Willem wrote last Monday: > > > The reason that Glenn decided to stop pushing compressed was after I did > > some research on 1000+ random PNG images. Roughly 25-30% contained a > > tEXt chunk, around 10% had iTXt chunks and literally zero contained a > > zTXt chunk. > I did not stop pushing compressed. I moved it into the separate zXIf proposal. > > How many of the iTXt's were compressed? > Also, what was the size distribution of the tEXt chunks? If they're small, they shouldn't be compressed, so it would not be surprising that they weren't. Glenn ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ png-mng-misc mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc