Re: The security of deflate-compressed streams with uncompressed-length field

Cosmin Truta <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.graphics.png.general
Message-ID <CAAoVtZzbLkuYi1dFn2CUdYnGYBeZqF41=ZCdu_G8iYgPwW9D9Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 6 February 2017 at 00:47, John Bowler
<[email protected]> wrote:
> My memory says this (I've not read the archives, so this really is
> just my memory, honest):

You didn't need archives. I already wrote 7 paragraphs in response to
that ridiculous act of cyber-bullying, 6 of which you purposely
removed.

> The issue was new decompression methods for IDAT.  You asserted that
> preservation of EXIF data was a significant issue.  I concurred.  I
> proposed a chunk to address this issue.  alt.flame.

Indeed. So I brought up the EXIF topic, and you concurred. Good job
writing that proposal, BTW.

Sincerely,
Cosmin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.